The board wants an AI plan
Owners or the board ask what the company is doing about AI, and nobody owns the answer. You need a position you can defend, not a vendor’s roadmap.
AI strategy discovery · five days · fixed price
For leadership teams being asked “what is our AI plan?”. Five working days of interviews and workflow review, spread over about two weeks, end in a decision you can act on: which use case comes first, what not to do, who owns it and what it will cost to run. Fixed price, from £3,000.
Led personally by Radko Diev — former COO and product owner of a regulated platform. No vendor or tool is chosen in advance.
AI plan: the first 90 days
Signed by the sponsor · reviewed on day 90
Who it is for
Owners or the board ask what the company is doing about AI, and nobody owns the answer. You need a position you can defend, not a vendor’s roadmap.
Suggestions from vendors, staff and competitors pile up. Each one is scored on value, effort, risk and running cost, so the first move can be defended.
A pilot ran and stalled. The same five days find what actually blocks production — data, integration, ownership, running cost or the model — and decide: scale, fix or stop.
How the five days run
Interviews need diaries, so the work is spread out. The sponsor gives about four hours — the kick-off and the decision workshop — and each person interviewed about an hour, up to two where a workflow is walked through.
The questions that must be answered, confirmation of the agreed scope — one function, two or three, or the whole organisation — and access to the documents and systems that matter.
Three to six conversations with the people who run the work: where it waits, gets re-keyed or is checked too late; what data exists and who owns it; what has been tried.
Every candidate scored for value, feasibility on the data you already hold, risk and the oversight it needs — with a named owner, the baseline it must beat and the cost to run.
Two hours with leadership: choose the first one or two, agree what not to do, and walk through the 90-day plan.
What you receive
Written and editable, in English or Bulgarian, plus a verdict on each pilot where pilots are in scope. No slide deck unless you ask for one.
One page leadership can sign: what to do first, what not to do, and who owns it.
Every candidate scored for value, effort, risk and running cost against today’s baseline.
Owners, dependencies and the date each decision falls due.
Data, systems, controls and people — for the use cases chosen, not a generic maturity score.
Illustrations of the formats, not client material.
What it costs
Agreed in writing before work starts; prices exclude VAT. Delivered remotely with expenses included; on site by agreement. Clients in the EU are quoted in euros. A working session in the previous 30 days is credited in full, and the discovery fee is credited against a Sprint commissioned within 30 days.
Not ready for five days? A one-day working session, from £1,500, takes a single process instead. See the working session
FAQ
About four hours from the sponsor — the kick-off and the decision workshop — and about an hour from each person interviewed, up to two where a workflow is walked through. Sofpact does the rest.
A sponsor who can make the decision, three to six people who run the work, and read access to the documents or systems that matter. The discovery needs no extracts of customer or staff records, and nothing is copied out of your systems without your agreement.
Then that is the result, and the decision page says why — for example, data that is not ready, or a process that has to change first. Stopping on evidence costs less than a pilot that stalls.
No. No platform, model or automation tool is chosen in advance, and recommendations follow your data, risk and running cost. Any vendor relationship that could touch your work is declared in the scope.
Radko Diev, personally — every interview, the scoring and the workshop. If the plan leads to a build, Radko builds the first version in a Sprint; any engineers it needs are named and agreed with you in the scope.
No. Each use case gets an operational risk tier and the human oversight it needs; your counsel and data protection officer own the legal interpretation.
Further reading How to build an AI strategy that survives contact with operations
A useful first conversation